Get Permission Basak and Arshiya Ara: Liquid biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool — A systematic review


Introduction

Oral cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer with India contributing to almost one-third of the total burden and the second country having the highest number of oral cancer cases globally. In India, around 77,000 new cases and 52,000 deaths are reported annually due to oral cancer, which is approximately one-fourth of global incidences.1 The cases of oral cancer are increasing widely in India and it has become matter of concern as about 70% of the cases are reported in the advanced stages (American Joint Committee on Cancer, Stage III-IV).1 Oral cancer is preventable and curable if detected in early stages but as majority of cases are often diagnosed at advanced stages, chances of cure are very low, leaving five-year survival rates around 20% only.

Carcinogenesis is a complex process in which heterogeneity plays an important role in the development and progression. The development of oral cancer is related to numerous factors, including environmental and lifestyle risk factors.2 Among these risk factors, the most frequently associated with oral cancer are alcohol intake and smoking.3 Other causative agents of oral cancer are Epstein Barr virus (EBV), human papillomaviruses (HPVs) or Candida albicans infection responsible for the activation of prooncogenic stimuli.4, 5 All these risk factors are responsible for the development of both genetic and epigenetic alterations that can promote tumor development and progression by altering key cellular mechanisms, such as apoptosis or cell proliferation.6 Thus molecular profiling plays role in early detection and better prognosis. In this sense, liquid biopsy has emerged as a revolution in the field of oncology.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) defines liquid biopsy as “a test done on a sample of blood to look for cancer cells from a tumor that are circulating in the blood or for pieces of DNA from tumor cells that are in the blood”.

Liquid biopsy uses body fluids, such as blood, plasma, serum, urine, and gastric juice, to reflect the disease state. Saliva being non-invasive tool is easily accessible and is plentiful in resources of biomarkers for diseases as well as pre-symptomatic and health status. As oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders are exposed to oral cavity, salivary biomarkers may be useful for their early detection.7

The aim of this systematic review is to get the overview of clinical significance of circulating biomarkers as diagnostic and prognostic tool in oral and head and neck carcinoma.

History of liquid biopsy assays

  1. As early as 1869, Thomas Ashworth first observed CTCs in a patient with metastasis.8

  2. In 1948, Mandel and Metais first detected and quantified cfDNA in both healthy and diseased patients.8

  3. In 1965, Bendich and collegues hypothesized that cf DNA could be involved in metastasis.8

  4. In 1966, Tan and colleagues observed high levels of cfDNA in SLE patients.

  5. In 1977, Leon et al. revealed cfDNA in oncology patient.8

  6. In 1994, specific mutations in cfDNA were detected by scientists.8

  7. In 2000, Veridex introduced first commercially available liquid biopsy assay, the CELLSEARCH CTC test.8

  8. In June 2016, FDA approved first liquid biopsy test, the cobas EGFR Mutation Test.8

  9. In August 2020, FDA approved two new tests which use next-generation sequencing (NGS) to target genes in advanced cancer patients, including mutations. These are Guardant Health’s Guardant 360 CDx assay, and FoundationOne Liquid CDx, marketed by Foundation Medicine.9 “These tests allow oncologists to focus care on the molecule of origin rather than the cell type,” said William G. Cance, MD, chief medical and scientific officer of the American Cancer Society. “Approval of these tests is another step in the pathway to precision medicine and targeted therapeutics.”

Material and Methods

  1. Search stratergy: This systematic review comprises an analysis of 11 years study articles done on potential biomarkers of oral carcinoma in liquid biopsy. A search limited to English language articles published between 2009 and 2020 was performed via PubMed, Medline, Google J-Gate. Keywords that were used are liquid biopsy, oral cancer, head and neck carcinoma, circulating biomarkers, precision medicine.

  2. Review methodology: Review of full texts, abstracts, review articles, case studies of relevant topic were selected and evaluated to match our inclusion criteria of clinical significance of circulating biomarkers in oral and head and neck carcinoma as diagnostic and prognostic tool.

  3. Data collection and extraction: The articles were collected and evaluated independently by the reviewer.

  4. Evaluation of articles: The articles selected as per inclusion criteria were evaluated for the type of study and newer technologies to extract those biomarkers were also ruled out along with future perspectives.

Results

The systematic review was done to rule out the clinical significance of circulating tumour markers (biomarkers) from body fluids in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or oral carcinoma and Head and Neck carcinoma (HNC) as diagnostic and prognostic tool.

A total of 87 articles were analysed. Among these 11 articles were similar,18 articles were related to other cancers of the body (breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, gastroesophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, etc.) therefore a total of 58 articles were included for this review study given in the flow diagram (Figure 1).

Figure 1

This figure shows the overall process from the literature search to data retrieval in the form of a flow diagram.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7f3ff725-6f32-40d8-b4e3-ff41884c9fb5image1.png
Table 1

The overall version of this review study is quoted in Table 1.

Sl No.

Study design

Reference articles

1

Prospective study

3 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 15, 16, 17 18 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 6, 1, 7, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 8, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 36, 37, 9, 38, 39, 40, 15, 16, 17, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 18, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 59, 60, 61

2

Retrospective study

4, 1, 25

26, 27, 28, 29 31, 33, 34

35, 12, 36, 38

39, 40 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 7, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 8, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 36, 37, 9, 38, 39, 40, 15, 16, 17, 41, 42, 43, 44

46, 47 51, 53

56, 22

62, 63 64

3

Case report

49 65

Discussion

The evidence from the research collected from these selected studies reveals the potential of liquid biopsy as an important prognostic and diagnostic tool in carcinomatous cases. It has emerged as a potential alternative to tissue biopsy. Tumors shed cells and genomic material into the blood, due to cell necrosis or apoptosis. These circulating biomarkers are listed below with their clinical significance. Schematic representation is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic diagram of circulating biomarkers.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7f3ff725-6f32-40d8-b4e3-ff41884c9fb5image2.png

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs)

CTCs are intact tumor cells which are shed from both primary tumor and metastatic sites into the blood stream. The number of CTCs present is very low counting One CTC per 10⁶-10⁷ leukocytes /ml of blood, with even lower in early stage of cancer. Studies showed that an average metastatic carcinoma patient shows that 5-50 CTCs for approximately 7.5ml of blood.53 These CTCs represent a highly dynamic cell population as they are characterized by high heterogeneity at the genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic levels.66 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of CTCs which can change during the course of the cancer by microenvironmental and therapeutic selective pressure. As CTCs counts run in parallel with the tumor burden of the disease, they serve to be a more accurate method for the real time monitoring of cancers than many other commonly used soluble biomarkers53 shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) detach from primary tumor as single cells and clusters, shed into the bloodstream, and migrate to colonize in distant organs, known as metastasis. It is assumed 1 ml of blood can comprise 1–10 single CTCs and roughly one CTC cluster, millions of WBCs and billions of RBCs. (b) The microenvironment of CTC cluster comprises immune cells, platelets, dendritic cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor stroma. Such microenvironment can protect CTC clusters from blood shear damage and immune attacks that provides CTC cluster metastatic advantages.67

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7f3ff725-6f32-40d8-b4e3-ff41884c9fb5image3.png

Detection & isolation

  1. EpCAM — affinity based: CellSearch system, CTC-Chip

  2. Physical properties-based: ISET, ScreenCell, Apostream, density gradient centrifugation.

  3. Other methods: FAST, EPISPOT, PRO Onc Assay.

Isolation is followed by PCR amplification and next generation sequencing (NGS). These help in determining Hypermethylation, hypomethylation, deletions, amplifications, chromosomal rearrangement and mutations.53

Clinical significance

  1. It can be used in prognosis.

  2. CTCs are useful in ruling out diagnosis and could be a substitute for tissue biopsy in cases of inaccessible neoplastic sites.

  3. Research is going on to use CTC as a mode to perform cancer screening.

  4. Data shows that CTC count has a potential role in real-time monitoring of response to therapies.30

  5. CTCs can also provide information on the epigenetic changes in the cancer cells.66

Role in oral cancer

CTCs have been mainly seen as prognostic and recurrence predictor in oral cancer studies.66

According to a study done by Partridge et al. in 2003, levels of disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) preoperatively and intraoperatively in both blood and bone marrow from 40 OSCC patients were evaluated. Presence of DTCs are associsted with high risk of loco-regional reccurence ad distant metastasis. Besides, their presence was also correlated with lower distant metastasis-free-survival and disease-free survival rates.

Another study was performed by Gröbe et al. to determine the level of CTC in various OSCC stages as prognostic marker. It was analysed that DTCs present in 20% of patients, while CTC around 12.5% with a range of 1–14 CTCs/7.5 mL. CTC detection was significantly correlated with tumour size, whereas disseminated DTCs were significantly correlated with the nodal status.

Limitations

  1. Heterogeneity of CTC populations.

  2. Low abundance and fragility.

  3. CTC detection requires sensitive and specific analytic methods.

  4. Multiplicity of technologies used for CTC isolation.30

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)

ctDNA is tumour DNA which got degraded from cell free DNA fragments of tumour origin into the bloodstream. Its production depends on tumour burden, cancer stage, cell turnover and response to therapy.53 ctDNA concentration is significantly increased in malignancy compared to that of healthy individuals.30 The diagrammatic representation of ctDNA formation is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Circulating tumor DNA from tumor to blood.68

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7f3ff725-6f32-40d8-b4e3-ff41884c9fb5image4.png

Detection & isolation

  1. Classical methods include — quantitative real-time PCR, fluorescent assays and spectrophotometric strategies.

  2. Digital PCR-based technologies.

  3. Next-generation sequencing technology.66

  4. Targeted plasma re-sequencing (TAm-Seq), Massively paralleled sequencing (MPS), Whole-genome sequencing (WGS), Whole exome sequencing (WES).58 

  5. Sanger sequencing and Pyrosequencing.51

Limitations

  1. Assay Sensitivity and Specificity for analysis of ctDNA58

  2. To Discriminate ctDNA from cfDNA66

  3. Assay standardization and Quantification30

Clinical significance

  1. Cancer screening

  2. ctDNA helps to detect the minimal residual disease as the amount of ctDNA formed is proportional to the residual tumor burden.

  3. Response and follow up to monitor prognosis

  4. To detect molecular alteration associated with resistant therapy64

Role in oral cancer

  1. Shukla et al. analysed quantity of ctDNA in OSCC by spectrophometry method and found no significant difference between OSCC patients and healthy individuals.

  2. Perdomo et al. reported detection of ctDNA mutations in HNC including oral cavity cancer

  3. Mazurek et al. analyzed HPV detection in OSCC patients using of DNA66

I. Exosomes

Exosomes are small membrane-bound vesicles released by different cells of the body including tumour cells. It was first reported by Pan and Johnstone in 1983.53 Exosomes consist of a lipid bilayer which contains both transmembrane and nonmembrane proteins, noncoding RNAs, mRNAs, miRNAs, DNA.30

The process of exosomes formation (Figure 5) begins with invagination of the plasma membrane of the cell to form small rounded structures called endosomes. As endosomes mature, inward budding of the endosome membrane results in the formation of numerous intraluminal vesicles(ILVs) which later gets released into the extracellular space, now called exosomes. Exosomes play an integral role in intercellular communication by transmitting signals and transferring contents. Exosomes are released from most cell types and can be found in all bodily fluids including urine, plasma, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, amniotic fluid, and breast milk.69 

Figure 5

Formation of exosomes.69

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7f3ff725-6f32-40d8-b4e3-ff41884c9fb5image5.jpeg

Detection & solation

  1. Conventioinal methods- Western blotting & ELISA

  2. New methods

  3. Nano-plasmonic sensor

  4. BEAMing

  5. DdPCR

  6. Microfluidic exosome analysis53

Limitations

  • Difficult extraction and Standardization.30

Clinical significance

  1. Tumour derived Exosomes increase TGF-β signaling pathway which contributes to progression & drug resistance of OSCC.66

  2. Correlation found between exosomal miR-21 levels and metastasis in lymph nodes by Li et al.

  3. Oral fluid-derived exosomes have been characterized morphologically in oral cancer by 3 markers CD63 (high), CD9 & CD81[ Zlotgorski- Hurvitz et al.]

  4. To discriminate between active-disease cancer patients & no evident disease after oncologic therapies [Ludwig et al.]

  5. In cancer, exosomes are secreted by the neoplastic cells to the TME and promote tumor growth, invasion and metastasis (Zhang and Grizzle 2014).

MiRNAs

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are one of the important components of the cell-free nucleic acids available in different body fluids.35 They circulate in bloodstream and are highly stable not even degraded by RNase enzyme. Thus miRNAs can be a reliable cancer biomarker.10, 11, 12 Exosome-miRNAs are reported to represent a subset of about 3% of the entire amount of cellfree miRNAs.13, 14

Clinical significance

According to various studies (Figure 6),

  1. mir-371, mir-150, mir-21 and mir-7d were found to be potential prognostic markers.

  2. mir-134, mir-146a, mir-338 and mir-371 were associated with metastases.

  3. mir-21 and mir-7d were correlated with resistance to chemotherapy, while mir-375, mir-196 and Mir-125b with sensitivity to radiotherapy.35

Figure 6

Summarized representation of circulating miRNAs reported as therapeutic and prognostic markers in OSCC. The red up and green down arrows represent the high and low levels of miRNAs in the body fluids of OSCC patients with respect to disease prognosis or response to therapy.35

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/7f3ff725-6f32-40d8-b4e3-ff41884c9fb5image6.png

III. lncRNAs

LncRNAs are defined as RNA transcripts which are greater than 200 nucleotides in length with no or limited protein-coding potential. These are important for various processes, like gene imprinting cell differentiation and organogenesis and play an important role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Some lncRNAs can be detected in exosomes, which are widely present in body fluids.39

Detection & isolation

They are isolated from exosomes by RNA extraction techniques such as phenol based techniques, combined phenol and column based approaches and pure column based methods.40 The methods used to detect lncRNAs are described in Table 2.

Table 2

Methods used for detecting lncRNAs.40

Method

Principle

Advantages

Disadvantages

Northern blot

Electrophoresis and detection with specific probe

-Fast, low-tech, cheap

-High risk of sample degradation

-Alternative splicing products can be detected

-Low sensitivity

-Both quantitative and qualitative method

-Only known sequences detected

- High specific

RT-qPCR

Transcript amplification and fluorescence signal detection after specific probe hybridization

-Cost-effective

-Splicing products no detected

-Time-efficient

-Nonspecific binding

- High sensitivity and specificity, l

- Maximum 4 different mRNAs can be detected simultaneously

- Low amount of starting material

- Only known sequences detected

- Results easy and fast to obtain

Microarrays

Molecular hybridization to detect the expression levels

Multiple mRNAs can be analyzed in the same experiment, well defined and standardized protocols, relatively low cost

-Detection of known sequences

-Non-specific hybridization

-No identification of mRNA variants

-High variability of low expressed mRNAs

RNA-seq

Next generation sequence based

-Independency from previous sequence information

-High cost

-High dynamic range

-Complex analysis of data

-Several isoforms of mRNA can be detected

-Low amount of starting material is required

Clinical significance

  1. It can be used as diagnostic and prognostic marker in various types of cancers.

  2. It can be used in cancer-targeted therapy as they are associated with drug resistance of tumour cells.39

Role in oral cancer

Tang et al. found relative abundance of lncRNAs in tissue or saliva samples of OSCC patients was investigation. Subsets of lncRNAs are expressed across non‑tumor, tumor and metastatic tissue samples. Besides, lncRNAs present in whole saliva can be used as potential marker for OSCC.16

Cytokeratin 20mRNA

According to a study done on postoperative peripheral blood samples of 40 OSCC patients to detect cytokeratin expression by real-time quantitative RT qPCR, it was found that

  1. CK 17 and CK 19 was not detected in any sample.

  2. CK 18 and CK 20 were detectable in 1 (2.5%) and in 14 (35.0%), samples respectively.

  3. CK 20 was not associated with lymph node status, clinical stage, or differentiation grade, but was significantly higher in patients with T3 and T4 OSCC (p = 0.04).

  4. Disseminated Tumour Cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of OSCC patients could only be detected by determination of CK 20 mRNA. Thus, detection of CK 20 mRNA in peripheral blood seems to be of relevance for prognosis in OSCC.17

Pros and cons

  1. Liquid biopsy is quicker than tissue biopsy37

  2. It can be used for real-time monitoring to see if therapy is working

  3. It can be repeated easily to see the status of tumor cells or cfDNA37

  4. Liquid biopsy tests can be used to monitor patients for mutations37

  5. In 2019, according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines older liquid biopsy tests should not be replaced by tissue biopsy.37

  6. Cance added that tumors are heterogenous, so it is impossible to know whether a liquid biopsy test analyzes DNA that represents a fraction of the tumor mutations or all mutations.70

  7. FDA approvals call for use of Guardant 360Dx and FoundationOne Liquid CDx in conjunction with tissue biopsy. The NCCN guidelines do suggest that liquid biopsy alone can be considered in patients who are not healthy enough for biopsy or who cannot provide sufficient tissue samples, Diehn pointed out.37

  8. New liquid biopsy tests are “not as accurate as looking at tissue. However, the technology is getting more sensitive,” added Papadopoulos.37

Conclusion

In spite of many advantages, the impact of Liquid Biopsy in clinical setting in oral cancer is still hindered by many hurdles. Broadly, liquid biopsy is a quick and comparatively straightforward process that usually includes a simple blood draw, extraction of nucleic acids from the blood plasma, and amplification of the molecular targets to enable analysis of the defined bio markers.

Therefore, further studies should be conducted to overcome the challenges and assess its wider clinical application.

Abbreviations

  1. CTC — Circulating tumour cell

  2. CfDNA — Cell free DNA

  3. CtDNA — Circulating tumour DNA

  4. EGFR — Epidermal growth factor receptor

  5. EpCAM — Epithelial cell adhesion molecule

  6. ISET — Isolation by size of tumour cells

  7. FAST — Fibre-optic array scanning technology

  8. EPISPOT — Epithelial immunospot

  9. PCR — Polymerase chain reaction

  10. MRNA — Messenger RNA

  11. ELISA — Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay

  12. BEAMing — Beads emulsion amplification magnetics

  13. DdPCR — Droplet digital PCR

  14. TGF-β — Transforming growth factor beta

  15. TME – Tumour microenvironment

  16. CDx – Companion diagnostic

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

F L Fernandez O R Gonzalez J L Lopez-Cedrun R Lopez L Muinelo-Romay M M Suarez-Cunqueiro Liquid Biopsy in Oral CancerInt J Mol Sci2018196170410.3390/ijms19061704

2 

M Kumar R Nanavati T G Modi C Dobariya Oral cancer: Etiology and risk factors: A reviewJ Cancer Res Ther20161224586310.4103/0973-1482.186696

3 

R A Beynon S Lang S Schimansky C M Penfold A Waylen S J Thomas Tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking at diagnosis of head and neck cancer and all-cause mortality: Results from head and neck 5000, a prospective observational cohort of people with head and neck cancerInt J Cancer2018143511142710.1002/ijc.31416

4 

Y She X Nong M Zhang M Wang Epstein-Barr virus infection and oral squamous cell carcinoma risk: A meta-analysisPLoS ONE20171210e018686010.1371/journal.pone.0186860

5 

M M Bakri H M Hussaini A R Holmes R D Cannon A M Rich Revisiting the association between candidal infection and carcinoma, particularly oral squamous cell carcinomaJ Oral Microbiol2010211710.3402/jom.v2i0.5780

6 

H Takeshima T Ushijima Accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal cells and cancer riskPrecis. Onc20193718

7 

N Reimers K Pantel Liquid biopsy: novel technologies and clinical applicationsClin Chem Lab Med2019573312318

8 

N Reimers K Pantel Liquid biopsy: novel technologies and clinical applicationsClin Chem Lab Med2019573312610.1515/cclm-2018-0610

9 

D Levenson A New Era for Liquid BiopsyJ Appl Lab Med2020https://www.aacc.org/cln/articles/2020/november/a-new-era-for-liquid-biopsy

10 

D Babji R Nayak K Bhat V Kotrashetti Cell-free tumor DNA: Emerging reality in oral squamous cell carcinomaJ Oral Maxillofac Pathol20192322738210.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_36_19

11 

G D Rubis R Sabna M Krishnan Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Diagnosis, Monitoring, and PrognosisTrends Pharm Sci20194031728610.1016/j.tips.2019.01.006

12 

B Arneth Update on the types and usage of liquid biopsies in the clinical setting: a systematic reviewBMC Cancer201818152710.1186/s12885-018-4433-3

13 

T Nonaka D Wong Liquid Biopsy in Head and Neck Cancer: Promises and ChallengesJ Dent Res2018976701810.1177/0022034518762071

14 

K Payne R Spruce A Beggs N Sharma A Kong T Martin Circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker and liquid biopsy in head and neck squamous cell carcinomaHead Neck20184071598160410.1002/hed.25140

15 

A Singhal A Hussain A Agarwal B Thakur Current status of cell-free DNA in head and neck cancer managementAnn Indian Acad Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg2019232273910.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_36_19

16 

J H V Ginkel M M H Huibers R Noorlag R D Bree R J V Es Liquid Biopsy: A Future Tool for Post Treatment Surveillance in Head and Neck Cancer?Int J Pathol Clin Res2015111310.23937/2469-5807/1510013

17 

E Crowley F D Nicolantonio F Loupakis A Bardelli Liquid biopsy: monitoring cancer-genetics in the bloodNat Rev Clin Oncol20131084728410.1038/nrclinonc.2013.110

18 

S Mazumdera S Dattaa J G Rayb K Chaudhuric R Chatterjee Liquid biopsy: miRNA as a potential biomarker in oral cancerCancer Epidemol2019581374510.1016/j.canep.2018.12.008

19 

C Chakraborty S Das Profiling cell-free and circulating miRNA: a clinical diagnostic tool for different cancersTumor Biol201637557051410.1007/s13277-016-4907-3

20 

E Larrea C Sole L Manterola I Goicoechea M Armesto M Arestin New Concepts in Cancer Biomarkers: Circulating miRNAs in Liquid BiopsiesInt J Mol Sci201617562710.3390/ijms17050627

21 

N Soda H A Bernd P Rehm N T Sonar M J A Nguyen Advanced liquid biopsy technologies for circulating biomarker detectionJo Mater Chem2019743667004

22 

Miyuki Tabata Yuji Miyahara Liquid biopsy in combination with solid-state electrochemical sensors and nucleic acid amplificationJ Mater Chem B2019743665569

23 

M T Gabriel D Heymann Exosomal lncRNAs: the newest promising liquid biopsyCancer Drug Resist2019210021710.20517/cdr.2019.69

24 

J Wang S Chang G Li Y Sun Application of liquid biopsy in precision medicine: opportunities and challengesFront Med2017114522710.1007/s11684-017-0526-7

25 

I P Ribeiro J B De Melo I M Carreira Head and neck cancer: searching for genomic and epigenetic biomarkers in body fluids - the state of artMol Cytogenet20191233

26 

T Blondal S J Nielsen A Baker D Andreasen P Mouritzen M W Teilum Assessing sample and miRNA profile quality in serum and plasma or other biofluidsMethods2013591S1610.1016/j.ymeth.2012.09.015

27 

K Wang S Zhang J Weber D Baxter D J Galas Export of microRNAs and microRNA-protective protein by mammalian cellsNucleic Acids Res2010382072485910.1093/nar/gkq601

28 

J D Arroyo J R Chevillet E M Kroh I K Ruf C C Pritchard D F Gibson Argonaute2 complexes carry a population of circulating microRNAs independent of vesicles in human plasmaProc Natl Acad Sci U. S. A2011108125003810.1073/pnas.1019055108

29 

A Turchinovich L Weiz A Langheinz B Burwinkel Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNANucleic Acids Res2011391672235610.1093/nar/gkr254

30 

D Biswas J Ganeshalingam J C Wan The future of liquid biopsyLancet Oncol 20202112e55010.1016/S1470-2045(20)30687-2

31 

M Eldh J Lotvall C Malmhall K Ekstrom Importance of RNA isolation methods for analysis of exosomal RNA: evaluation of different methodsMol Immunol20125042788610.1016/j.molimm.2012.02.001

32 

H Tang Z Wu J Zhang B Su Salivary lncRNA as a potential marker for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosisMol Med Rep201373761710.3892/mmr.2012.1254

33 

T Toyoshima E Vairaktaris E Nkenke K A Schlegel F W Neukam J Ries Hematogenous Cytokeratin 20 mRNA Detection Has Prognostic Impact in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Preliminary ResultsAnticancer Res20092912917

34 

I G D Vigil A K M Martínez J Y Wang M H A Roehrl H A B Saldaña The dawn of the liquid biopsy in the fight against cancerOncotarget20189229122210.18632/oncotarget.23131

35 

K Aro F Wei D T Wong Michael Tu Saliva Liquid Biopsy for Point-of-Care ApplicationsFront Public Health201757710.3389/fpubh.2017.00077

36 

H Schmidt A Kulasinghe L Kenny C Punyadeera The development of a liquid biopsy for head and neck cancersOral Oncology20166181110.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.07.014

37 

R S Khan Z Khurshid Y I Asiri Advancing Point-of-Care (PoC) Testing Using Human Saliva as Liquid BiopsyDiagnostics2017733910.3390/diagnostics7030039

38 

O R González C M Reglero A S Barreira R L López M M SCunqueiro Muinelo-Romay. miRNAs in liquid biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis: Systematic review and meta-analysisOral Oncol20199910446510.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104465

39 

L Sorber K Zwaenepoel J Jacobs K D Winne S Goethals P Reclusa Circulating Cell-Free DNA and RNA Analysis as Liquid Biopsy: Optimal Centrifugation ProtocolCancers201911445810.3390/cancers11040458

40 

B Gold M Cankovic L V Furtado Do circulating tumor cells, exosomes, and circulating tumor nucleic acids have clinical utility? A report of the association for molecular pathologyJ Mol Diagn20151732093310.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.02.001

41 

Y C Ma L Wang F L Yu Recent advances and prospects in the isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET) methodologyTechnol Cancer Res Treat201312429530910.7785/tcrt.2012.500328

42 

A L Revenfeld R Bæk M H Nielsen A Stensballe K Varming M Jørgensen Diagnostic and prognostic potential of extracellular vesicles in peripheral bloodClin Ther20143668307610.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.008

43 

V R Minciacchi M R Freeman D Vizio Extracellular vesicles in cancer: exosomes, microvesicles and the emerging role of large oncosomesSemin Cell Dev Biol201540415110.1016/j.semcdb.2015.02.010

44 

L Li J Zhang X Jiang Q Li Promising clinical application of ctDNA in evaluating immunotherapy efficacyAm J Cancer Res2018810194756

45 

X Wu R Mastronicola Q Tu A rare case of extremely high counts of circulating tumor cells detected in a patient with an oral squamous cell carcinomaBMC Cancer20161655210.1186/s12885-016-2591-8

46 

M Grimm S Hoefert M Krimmel Monitoring carcinogenesis in a case of oral squamous cell carcinoma using a panel of new metabolic blood biomarkers as liquid biopsiesOral Maxillofac Surg201620329530210.1007/s10006-016-0549-2

47 

L A Diaz A Bardelli Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNAJ Clin Oncol20143265798610.1200/JCO.2012.45.2011

48 

R A Mathai R Vidya B S Reddy L Thomas K Udupa J Kolesar Potential Utility of Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for the Assessment of Solid Tumors: Implications in the Precision OncologyJ Clin Med20198337310.3390/jcm8030373

49 

M D Zhou S Hao A Williams Separable Bilayer Microfiltration Device for Viable Label-free Enrichment of Circulating Tumour CellsSci Rep201447392

50 

H Hou M E Warkiani B L Khoo Isolation and retrieval of circulating tumor cells using centrifugal forcesSci Rep201331259

51 

B Lu T Xu S Zheng A Goldkorn Y C Tai Parylene membrane slot filter for the capture, analysis and culture of viable circulating tumor cellsInt Conference On Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Mems)2010935810.1109/MEMSYS.2010.5442361

52 

N M Karabacak P S Spuhler F Fachin E J Lim V Pai E Ozkumur Microfluidic, marker-free isolation of circulating tumor cells from blood samplesNat Protoc20149369471010.1038/nprot.2014.044

53 

W Harb A Fan T Tran D C Danila D Keys M Schwartz Mutational analysis of circulating tumor cells using a novel microfluidic collection device and qPCR assayTransl Oncol2013655283810.1593/tlo.13367

54 

N Saucedo-Zeni S Mewes R Niestroj L Gasiorowski D Murawa P Nowaczyk A novel method for the in vivo isolation of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood of cancer patients using a functionalized and structured medical wireInt J Oncol201241412415010.3892/ijo.2012.1557

55 

P Economopoulou I Kotsantis E Kyrodimos E S Lianidou A Psyrri Liquid biopsy: An emerging prognostic and predictive tool in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)Oral Oncol20177483910.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.09.012

56 

T M Morgan Liquid biopsy: Where did it come from, what is it, and where is it going?Investig Clin Urol20196031394110.4111/icu.2019.60.3.139

57 

X Deng Y Nakamura Cancer Precision Medicine: From Cancer Screening to Drug Selection and Personalized ImmunotherapyTrends Pharmacol Sci2019381152410.1016/j.tips.2016.10.013

58 

S Perakis M R Speicher Emerging concepts in liquid biopsiesBMC Med2017151757510.1186/s12916-017-0840-6

59 

Ken Russell Coelho Challenges of the Oral Cancer Burden in IndiaJournal of Cancer Epidemiology20121701932701932

60 

A Panabieres C Pantel The circulating tumor cells: liquid biopsy of cancerClin Lab Diagn2014591110810.1373/clinchem.2012.194258

61 

G Rossi M Ignatiadis Promises and Pitfalls of Using Liquid Biopsy for Precision MedicineCancer Res201979112798280410.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3402

62 

M Ma H Zhu C Zhang X Sun X Gao G Chen Liquid biopsy"-ctDNA detection with great potential and challengesAnn Transl Med201531623510.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.09.29

63 

M Lustberg K R Jatana M Zborowski J J Chalmers Emerging technologies for CTC detection based on depletion of normal cellsRecent Results Cancer Res20121959711010.1007/978-3-642-28160-0_9

64 

G Clawson E Kimchi S D Patrick P Xin R Harouaka S Zheng Circulating tumor cells in melanoma patientsPlos One2012774105210.1371/journal.pone.0041052

65 

S Nagrath L V Sequist S Maheswaran D W Bell D Irimia L Ulkus Toner M. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technologyNature200745071731235910.1038/nature06385

66 

V Borse A N Konwar P Buragohain Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in IndiaSens Int2020110004610.1016/j.sintl.2020.100046

67 

P Rostami N Kashaninejad K Moshksayan M S Saidi B Firoozabadi N Nguyen Novel approaches in cancer management with circulating tumor cell clustersJ Sci Adv Mater Devices20194111810.1016/j.jsamd.2019.01.006

68 

S J Dawson Characterizing the Cancer Genome in BloodCold Spring Harb Perspect Med2019942688010.1101/cshperspect.a026880

69 

O Norahayu J Rahman A Nadiah Cancer-Derived Exosomes as Effectors of Key Inflammation-Related PlayersFront Immunol201910210310.3389/fimmu.2019.02103

70 

Y Li E M Bahassi Biofluid-based circulating tumor molecules as diagnostic tools for use in personalized medicineJ Mol Biomarkers Diagn2013511576310.4172/2155-9929.1000157



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 16-11-2021

Accepted : 23-11-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijmi.2021.031


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1126

PDF Downloaded: 237