Get Permission Akhila, Anusha, Deepa, Supriya, and Tanya: Surgical guides in implantology: A realistic approach towards precision


Introduction

Over the past few years, dental implants have proven to be a new horizon in the field of dentistry. Recent studies on dental implants have revealed a high implant survival rate.1 Nevertheless, improper diagnosis and implant placement that resulted in inadvertent surgical and prosthetic complications has been documented.2 These factors further determine the long-term success of the dental prosthesis. Mal-aligned implants often complicate the clinical and laboratory procedures, due to improper load distribution that results in an overall increase in stress concentration on supporting structures. This might further compromise the maintenance of the bone-implant interface.3 To overcome these shortcomings related to implant positioning and their restorative outcomes, the concept of prosthetically driven implants has emerged that include, surgical guides, and templates.4 The surgical guide templates provide the best assistance in diagnosis and treatment planning and facilitate proper positioning and angulation of the implants in the bone. They assure better esthetic and restorative outcomes and reduce surgical and prosthetic complications. Increasing demand for dental implants lead to the development of newer and advanced techniques for the fabrication of these templates.5 With the introduction of CAD-CAM technology into the field of implantology, it is now possible to design and construct these surgical guides virtually and enable implant placement even without reflecting a soft tissue flap.6 Therefore, this review article highlights.

Ideal Requisites

Ideally, the surgical guide should possess the following characteristics:7

  1. Accurately transfer the pre-surgical work-up information to the operating field three dimensionally i.e. bucco-lingually, mesio-distally, and apico-coronally.

  2. Simple to fabricate and cost-effective.

  3. Adequate retention in the surgical field.

  4. Provide easy access to drills/guide pins/osteotomes intra-operatively.

Extensions

The template should extend over and/or around enough teeth to stabilize and position the guide stent, in case the arch treated has remaining teeth. In a completely edentulous situation, the template should extend onto unreflected soft tissue regions like the palate and tuberosities in the maxilla, or the retromolar pads in the mandible. Thereby, the guide template may be used after the soft tissue reflection and during the osteotomy site preparation.8

Types of Surgical Guides

Based on the area of operation 9, 10

Guides for partially edentulous sites: Tooth-supported surgical guides can be used in short-span partially edentulous arches. They require at least three stable teeth to support the guide during the surgery. In the case of long-span partially edentulous arches tooth and bone-supported implant surgical guides are indicated. This requires at least 3 cm of supporting bone.

Guides for completely edentulous site: Mucosa or bone-supported surgical guides are indicated. Bone guides are specially indicated when edentulous sites possess a thin bone. The flap elevation should enable the insertion of the guide and provide a good view of implant sites.

Based On Utility9, 10

Pilot guides

This surgical guides only control the implant angulation by allowing only the pilot drill. Depth control is to be attained manually using the markings on drills. These pilot guides are removed after pilot drilling and the osteotomy site is expanded using conventional drilling without the guide.

Complete drill guides

They are provided with different drill keys or sleeves. As the osteotomy site is widened with each sequential drill, the sleeves are changed concomitantly. Both the angulation as well as the size of the osteotomy is controlled by the guide but the depth is controlled manually.

Safe guides/easy guides

They are provided with additional implant drill stoppers that control the depth of drilling in addition to the sleeves of different diameters. They enable osteotomy site preparation and also implant placement.

Based on design concepts

Surgical guide template fabrication requires a diagnostic tooth arrangement through any of the following ways like: (1) a diagnostic waxing, (2) a trial denture teeth arrangement, or (3) the duplication of a pre-existing dentition/restoration. The fabrication of the surgical guide templates is then based on one of the following design concepts.11, 12

Non-limiting design

This design provides the ideal location of the implants without any emphasis on the angulation, therefore allowing too much flexibility in the final implant position. Blustein et. al. 13 and Engelman et. al.14 described a technique in which a clear vacuum-formed matrix with a guide pin hole was used (Figure 1). This hole indicated the optimal implant position. However, the angulation was determined by using adjacent and opposing teeth as reference.

Figure 1

Clear vacuum-formed matrix

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/0b2a4105-a3bb-4feb-a336-0d367a3f5880image1.png

Partially Limiting Design 12

This design concept involves the fabrication of a radiographic template, which is later converted into a surgical guide template following radiographic evaluation. They are used, only to direct the initial drill and the remainder of the osteotomy site is prepared freehand by the surgeon. Various modifications were proposed by different authors concerned to the material used for the fabrication, radiographic marker used, type of imaging system used, and the process involved in converting the radiographic template into a surgical template etc. Yet, this technique failed to completely restrict the angulation of the surgical drills.

Completely Limiting Design

This design tends to restrict all the instruments used for the osteotomy in a buccolingual and mesiodistal plane. The depth of the preparation is limited by drill stops. As the surgical guides is more restrictive, subsequent surgical execution is carried out intra-operatively with minimal decision making.

This further includes 2 designs:

  1. Cast-based guided surgical guide and

  2. Computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) based surgical guide.

Cast-based guided surgical guide 15

It is a combination of an analog technique used along with bone sounding and the use of periapical radiographs in a conventional flapless guided implant surgery. In this technique, the root structure is transpositioned of onto the cast by modifying a periapical radiograph using digital software. The cast is then sectioned at the pre-determined implant site, and bone-sounding measurements are transferred to help in orientation of the drill bit to perform a cast osteotomy. A laboratory analog is placed in the site, and a guide sleeve consistent with the implant width is modified using wires that are used to create a framework around the teeth. Vinyl polysiloxane occlusal registration material is used to form the superstructure.

Computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) based surgical guide:16, 17, 18, 19, 20

CAD/CAM technology uses data from computerized tomography scans (CT) for planning rehabilitation using implants. These CT images are converted into data that can be recognized by the planning software. The software then transfers this pre-surgical plan to the surgical site using stereo lithographic drill guides.

The following steps are involved in the fabrication of CAD/CAM-based surgical guides:

  1. Fabrication of the radiographic template,

  2. The computerized tomography scan,

  3. Implant planning using interactive implant surgical planning software, and

  4. Fabrication of the stereolithographic drill guide

The fabricated radiographic template should exactly replicate the desired prosthetic end result, as it allows the clinician to visualize the location of planned implants from an esthetic and biomechanical point of view. Following this, an interocclusal index is fabricated, to allow reproducible placement of the scan template intraorally. A double scanning procedure is then carried out. The first scanning is done with the patient wearing the radiographic scan template and radiographic index (interocclusal index). This scan enables us to visualize the bony architecture and anatomy of the site of interest. The second scan is performed without the index to visualize the non-radiopaque radiographic guide. The resulting data is then superimposed over each other according to the radiographic markers and are further converted into a file format compatible with the 3D planning program. A virtual surgical procedure can be performed at this point. The 3D planning software enables simultaneous visualization of both the arches and the radiographic scan template in 3 spatial planes and helps to virtually plan the location, angle, depth, and diameter of the implants. After the computer planning is accomplished, it is saved as a ‘‘.sim’’ file and sent for fabrication of the surgical guide, using stereolithography to the processing center. This technique enables flapless surgery, allows pre-surgical fabrication of the master cast and provisionalization, and facilitates immediate loading. However, various complications related to inaccurate planning, radiographic stent error, and intrinsic errors during scanning, software planning, the rapid prototyping of the guide stent, and the transfer of information for the prosthetics were recorded.(Figure: 2a, b)

Figure 2

a, b: Computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) based surgical guide

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/0b2a4105-a3bb-4feb-a336-0d367a3f5880image2.png

Various Materials Used for fabrication

The surgical guides are fabricated using materials like self/light cure acrylic resin, metal reinforced acrylic; vacuum formed polymers and stereolithographic models. Manually processed resin and vacuum-formed guides possess a lesser accuracy when compared to the CAD-CAM-designed stereolithographic models.21

Recent Advancements

Stereolithography

It is a computer-guided, laser-dependent, rapid prototyping polymerization process that can exactly duplicate the shape of the patient’s skeletal anatomic landmarks in a sequential layer of a special polymer to produce a special 3D transparent resin model that fits precisely on the hard and/or soft tissues. The hardened polymeric prototype is provided with spaces for stainless steel or titanium drill-guiding tubes. These tubes precisely guide the implant drills, avoiding the need for the pilot drills. 22, 23 (Figure 3)

Figure 3

Stereolithographic model

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/0b2a4105-a3bb-4feb-a336-0d367a3f5880image3.png

Nobel Guide Computerized Surgical Template System

Nobel Biocare’s NobelGuide is a planning and surgical concept that uses Nobel Biocare’s Procera® surgical planning software to allow dentists to place implants in a single visit enabling the patient to leave the dental office with a fully functioning tooth or teeth. The entire implant treatment, including number, length, and angulation can be planned using the software. CT scans or a plaster model of the patient are utilized for determining the bone shape and location. The planned data can be used for the fabrication of a surgical template that permits a less invasive, flapless surgery. NobelGuide allows the simultaneous placement of the implant, abutment, and restorative crown or bridge in the same visit.24

Conclusion

The advancements in technology and material aspects have improved the precision and reduced the uncertainty of dental implants. The surgical guides have proven to ensure favorable restorative and aesthetic outcomes than conventional implant placement. However, accurate pre-surgical planning and clinician skills also play a crucial role to achieve a successful outcome.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

M Torabinejad P Anderson J Bader Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic reviewJ Prosthet Dent2007984285311

2 

S D Ganz Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guidesJ Oral Maxillofac Surg20056395971

3 

M L Arlin Dental implants and the partially edentulous patientPeriodontics20004938791

4 

D A Garber U C Belser Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site developmentCompend Contin Educ Dent1995168798802

5 

C Park A J Raigrodski J Rosen C Spiekerman R M London Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro studyJ Prosthet Dent2009101637281

6 

S F Balshi G J Wolfinger T J Balshi Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer tomography, CAD/CAM technology and the internet for immediate loading of dental implantsJ Esthat Restor Dent200626323582

7 

J Y Kim The implant surgical guide: Practical and innovative designs and approachesDent Implantol20092017380

8 

Meffert M Roland Reconstructive Aesthetic Implant SurgeryReconstr Aesthetic Imp Surg2003124334

9 

S S Khanna B Sugriv P M Baisane Surgical Guides in Implants: A Review.Saudi J Oral and Dent Res20205942530

10 

E Moslehifard S Nokar Designing a custom made gauge device for application in the access hole correction in the dental implant surgical guideJ Indian Prosthodont Soc20121221239

11 

C E Misch F Dietsh-Misch Diagnostic casts, preimplant prosthodontics, treatment prostheses, and surgical templates2nd 199913550

12 

L J Stumpel Cast-based guided implant placement: a novel techniqueJ Prosthet Dent20081001619

13 

R Blustein R Jackson K Rotskoff R E Coy D Godar Use of splint material in the placement of implantsInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants198611479

14 

M J Engelman J A Sorensen P Moy Optimum placement of osseointegrated implantsJ Prosthet Dent198859946773

15 

M A Aras Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a reviewJ Oral Implantol201238564352

16 

M Jabero D P Sarment Advanced surgical guidance technology: a reviewImplant Dent200615213542

17 

D M Almog B W Benson L Wolfgang N L Frederiksen S L Brooks Computerized tomography-based imaging and surgical guidance in oral implantologyJ Oral Implantol2006321148

18 

F Valente G Schiroli A Sbrenna Accuracy of computeraided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic studyInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants200924223442

19 

J Horwitz O Zuabi E E Machtei Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro studyClin Oral Implants Res20092010115662

20 

D Schneider P Marquardt M Zwahlen R E Jung A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistryClin Oral Implants Res2009207386

21 

V Arisan Z C Karabuda T Ozdemir Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative studyJ Periodontol20108114351

22 

D P Sarment P Sukovic N Clinthorne Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guideInt J Oral Maxillofac Implants20032735717

23 

A E Ersoy I Turkyilmaz O Ozan E A Mcglumphy Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implantsJ Periodontol2008798133945

24 

A K Garg Implant surgical templates in implant dentistry: Nobel GuideTMDent Implantol20071812533



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 18-09-2022

Accepted : 26-09-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmi.2022.024


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 930

PDF Downloaded: 174