Get Permission Bandlamudi, Pavithra M, Subramanian, Mariappan, and Yoganandham: Location of mandibular foramen in dry mandibles in relation to various anatomical landmarks


Introduction

Mandibular foramen is located on the medial surface of the ramus of the mandible. Inferior alveolar vessels and nerve pass through this foramen. Inferior alveolar nerve is a branch from posterior division of mandibular nerve, which gives off nerve to mylohyoid just before it enters the mandibular canal through the mandibular foramen. It forms a plexus called inferior alveolar plexus and supplies to all the lower teeth and comes out as mental nerve through mental foramen.1 For any procedure on the lower teeth, the commonly used local anaesthetic technique is inferior alveolar nerve block.2 Precise localization of the mandibular foramen is necessary for insertion of anaesthetic needle during nerve block. Identifying the exact location of mandibular foramen with respect to different anatomic landmarks determines the success rate of the block.

The position of the foramen was found to be variable. However, it is predominantly located at the midpoint between the anterior and posterior borders of the ramus present halfway between the mandibular notch and the lower border of the mandible or two thirds of the line joining the coronoid process to the angle of the mandible.3

Many techniques of inferior alveolar nerve block have been described. Inferior alveolar nerve block failure is common and it occurs even with experienced hands. Failure with this procedure could be as high as 45per cent.4, 5, 6 Correct anatomical location plays an important role in successful inferior alveolar nerve block. The mandibular foramen is often selected as a reference point with the base of the mandible to establish racial difference. 7, 8

Accessory mandibular foramen is any opening in the mandible other than the mandibular foramen, mental foramen, lingual foramen, and sockets of teeth.9 The presence of accessory foramina and additional branches of inferior alveolar nerve may lead to increased rates of failure as all the branches may not be anaesthetized.10

The aim of the present study is to locate the mandibular foramen with respect to different anatomic landmarks for accurate inferior alveolar nerve block and to find the presence of accessory foramina.

Materials and Methods

A total number of 51 dry adult human mandibles consisting of 102 mandibular foramina of unknown sex and age were studied from the collection available in the Department of Anatomy. Abnormal and damaged mandibles were excluded from the study. A Digital vernier calliper of 0.01mm accuracy was used for taking the measurement. Irrespective of shape of lingula, the centre of mandibular foramen was taken as the reference point. The distances between various anatomic landmarks mentioned below and the mandibular foramen (Figure 1) were measured by two independent observers and the mean value of those two observations were taken up for the study.

  1. Anterior border of ramus of mandible

  2. Posterior border of ramus of mandible

  3. Mandibular incisure

  4. Mandibular base

  5. Distance from middle of socket of III molar in edentulous and middle of occlusal surface of third molar in dentulous mandible

  6. Apex of retromolar trigone

Width of the mandibular foramen was also measured. The location of the mandibular foramen in relation to the occlusal plane of the molar teeth was also observed. The angle of the mandible was measured with a goniometer. Further observation regarding the presence of accessory mandibular foramen was done. Observations were tabulated.

Figure 1

Diagram showing the various measurements made from mandibular foramen

1: Mandibular foramen to anterior border of ramus, 2: Mandibular foramen to posterior border of ramus, 3: Mandibular foramen to mandibular incisure, 4: Mandibular foramen to base of mandible, 5: Mandibular foramen to middle of occlusal surface of 3rd molar tooth, 6: Mandibular foramen to Apex of retromolar trigone.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/e376ace2-8163-4ef4-a451-ceb796847330image1.jpg

Statistical analysis: All the measurements were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) along with their range. The difference between the right and left side measurements were analysed using paired t test. The correlation between the gonial angle and other distances was analysed by the Pearson linear correlation test using SPSS Version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The level of significance adopted was 95%, or p<0.05.

Results

A total of 51 mandibles were assessed of which 16 were dentulous and 35 were edentulous.

The distance between mandibular foramen and various landmarks and other measurements are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Distance between mandibular foramen and different anatomic landmarks and other measurements

Measurement

Side

Mean ± S.D. (mm)

Range (mm)

95% Confidence Interval

t

Significance (2-tailed)

Lower

Upper

AB-MF

R

16.41 ± 2.44

12.39 - 22.65

-0.99

0.12

-1.59

0.12

L

16.85 ± 2.55

12.59 - 23.58

MF-PB

R

10.29 ± 2.08

7 - 17.61

-0.39

0.69

0.54

0.59

L

10.14 ± 2.02

6.22 - 14.83

MI-MF

R

22.58 ± 3.14

16.25 - 30.22

-0.22

1.49

1.48

0.15

L

21.94 ± 3.09

16.08 - 31.14

MF-MB

R

23.72 ± 3.38

15.93 - 30.15

-1.82

0.25

-1.53

0.13

L

24.51 ± 3.27

17.49 - 31.33

3rd Molar-MF

R

22.99 ± 3.86

14.21 - 35.92

-1.44

0.25

-1.41

0.16

L

23.59 ± 3.59

14.93 - 35.41

Apex of RMT-MF

R

18.29 ± 3.03

11.44 - 24.94

-2.13

-0.89

-4.87

0.00*

L

19.79 ± 3.18

13.18 - 28.82

AB-PB

R

29.98 ± 3.20

23.47 - 39.46

-0.29

0.75

0.89

0.38

L

29.75 ± 3.46

22.33 - 38.41

F Width

R

4.56 ± 0.74

2.57 - 6.37

-0.08

0.34

1.25

0.22

L

4.43 ± 0.93

1.31 - 6.78

Go (in degree)

R

122.67 ± 5.18

114 - 132

-3.01

0.15

-1.82

0.07

L

124.10 ± 5.99

108 - 137

[i] R: Right side; L: Left side; Ab: Anterior border of ramus; Pb: Posterior border of ramus; MI: Mandibular incisure; MB: Mandibular base; RMT: retromolar trigone, Go: Gonial angle; MF: Mandibular foramen; F: Foramen; * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level

Table 2

Correlation between Gonial angle and different measurements on the right and left sides

Parameters

Right side

Left side

Pearson Correlation

Significance (2-tailed)

Pearson Correlation

Significance (2-tailed)

AB-MF

-0.27

0.05

-0.32*

0.02

MF-PB

-0.44**

0.001

-0.52**

0.001

MI-MF

-0.04

0.77

-0.07

0.65

MF-MB

-0.347*

0.01

-0.49

0.001

3rd Molar-MF

-0.01

0.97

-0.12*

0.42

Apex of RMT-MF

-0.22

0.11

-0.17**

0.24

AB-PB

-0.47**

0.001

-0.63

0.001

F Width

-0.08

0.58

-0.27

0.06

[i] R: Right side; L: Left side; Ab: Anterior border of ramus; Pb: Posterior border of ramus; MI: Mandibular incisure; MB: Mandibular base; RMT: retromolar trigone; MF: Mandibular foramen; F: Foramen; ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level; * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level

Table 3

Comparison of distances between mandibular foramen and various landmarks with other studies

Author, year

Year

Side

AB-MF (mm)

MF-PB (mm)

MI-MF (mm)

MF-MB (mm)

3rd Molar-MF (mm)

Apex of RMT-MF (mm)

AB-PB (mm)

F Width (mm)

Nicholson ML3

1985

R L

16.0±2.1 16.8±2.2

14.9±2.1 14.6±1.9

23.6±3.5 23.3±3.5

23.9±3.7 23.3±3.3

19.6±3.8 19.3±3.6

-

29.8±3.2 29.8±3.0

-

Kilarkaje N et al. 11

2005

R L

18.5±1.9 18.5±2.0

-

21.6±3.1 21.6±3.4

-

-

-

-

Ennes JP & Medeiros RM 12

2009

R L

14.6±2.9 14.6±3.2

12.1±2.3 12.3±2.3

24.3±3.3 24.4±3.6

22.3±4.8 22.4±5.1

-

-

29.2±3.9 29.4±4.0

-

Prado FB et al. 13

2010

R L

19.2±3.6 18.8±3.8

14.2±8.4 13.0±2.6

23.6±3.1 23.1±3.0

-

-

-

-

Thangavelu K et al. 14

2012

R L

18.9±2.1 18.8±2.3

14.3±1.8 14.3±1.7

27.6±4.2 27.3±4.1

-

-

-

-

Shenoy V et al. 15

2012

R L

16.1±2.0 16.3±1.8

11.6±2.1 11.3±1.9

23.5±3.1 23.5±3.1

23.5±2.8 22.8±2.7

-

-

30.7±2.7 30.7±2.7

-

Samanta PP & Karb P 10

2013

R L

15.7±2.9 16.2±2.8

13.2±1.7 12.7±2.0

22.7±3.0 22.2±2.9

-

-

-

-

-

Padmavathi G et al. 16

2014

R L

16.8±2.8 16.9±2.5

11.7±2.0 12.1±2.4

22.0±3.0 22.3±3.4

-

-

-

-

-

Sultana Q et al. 17

2015

R L

17.6±2.7 17.9±2.7

11.3±2.0 11.4±1.9

22.9±3.5 22.3±3.1

-

17.9 17.6

-

-

-

Gopalakrishna K et al. 18

2016

R L

14.6±3.1 15.3±3.1

12.3±3.1 13.5±3.9

21.2±4.5 21.1±3.1

-

14.3±3.1 14.2±2.5

-

-

-

Shalini R et al. 19

2016

R L

17.1±2.7 17.4±3.0

10.4±2.1 9.6±2.0

21.7±2.7 21.9±3.3

22.3±3.3 25.3±4.5

22.8±3.9 23.2±4.2

12.2±2.1 12.1±2.3

31.7±3.8 31.4±3.9

4.1±1.5 4.3±1.6

Rajkumari K et al. 20

2017

R L

16.7±1.9 16.9±1.9

11.0±1.2 11.2±1.4

22.9±3.8 23.1±3.6

24.9±3.2 24.6±3.2

-

-

-

-

Sahu R et al. 21

2017

R L

17.2±1.8 17.0±2.6

16.1±1.7 16.0±2.3

20.8±3.4 21.3±3.6

-

-

-

-

-

Sandhya K et al. 22

2019

R L

16.0±3.5 16.2±3.9

10.2±2.3 10.2±5.2

20.4±3.8 20.1±3.8

24.1±4.9 24.8±4.0

-

-

-

-

Present Study

2019

R L

16.4±2.4 16.8±2.5

10.2±2.0 10.1±2.0

22.5±3.1 21.9±3.0

23.7±3.3 24.5±3.2

22.9±3.8 23.5±3.5

18.2±3.0 19.7±3.1

29.9±3.2 29.7±3.4

4.5±0.7 4.4±0.9

[i] R: Right side; L: Left side; Ab: Anterior border of ramus; Pb: Posterior border of ramus; MI: Mandibular incisure; MB: Mandibular base; RMT: retromolar trigone; MF: Mandibular foramen; F: Foramen

Table 4

Comparison of the presence of accessory mandibular foramen

Author

Bilateral (%)

Unilateral (%)

Absent (%)

Sultana Q et al.17

13

R-24 L-23

40

Gopalakrishna K et al. 18

0

18

82

Shalini R et al.19

10.3

R-12.2 L-9.8

67.6

Rajkumari K et al.20

18

10

72

Present study

27.4

R-13.7 L-17.6

41.1

Gonial angles are almost similar on the right and left sides respectively. Width of the mandibular foramen was 4.56 ± 0.74mm and 4.43 ± 0.93mm on right and left side respectively. There was no significance difference in these measurements between right and left side except the distance between mandibular foramen and apex of retromolar trigone.

The association between gonial angle and various measurements are tabulated in Table 2. Gonial angle was found to have a negative correlation with all the measurements bilaterally. Of these, the negative correlation between gonial angle and the distance between posterior border and mandibular foramen (both sides), distance between apex of retromolar trigone and mandibular foramen (left side) and antero-posterior distance of the ramus (right side) were highly significant. Whereas, significant negative correlation was observed between gonial angle and distance between anterior border of ramus and mandibular foramen, distance between mandibular base and mandibular foramen, distance between 3rd molar and mandibular foramen. This indicates that as the gonial angle increases, the distance between mandibular foramen and various anatomical landmarks decreases. and vice-versa.

Accessory foramina were found bilaterally in 14 mandibles (27.4%) and only on the right side in 7 mandibles (13.7%) and only on left side in 9 mandibles (17.6%).

In relation to the occlusal plane of molar teeth, the location of mandibular foramen was above in 11 mandibles, at the same level in 17 mandibles and below in 23 mandibles on the right side. Whereas, on the left side 13 were above, 17 were at the same level and 21 were below the level of the occlusal plane. This indicates that in the present study, the location of mandibular foramen was predominantly below the level of the occlusal plane of molar teeth.

Discussion

Locating the mandibular foramen for inferior alveolar nerve block is of great importance for many procedures in dentistry. Accurate location enables a more effective anaesthesia and better comfort to patient. Many studies have been carried out to locate the mandibular foramen using distances from different anatomical landmarks (Table 3).

The mean distance of mandibular foramen from the anterior border of ramus of mandible was 16.4 mm on right side and 16.8 mm on left side which was similar to the studies done by Padmavathi G et al,16 Sandhya K et al.,22 Shenoy V et al.15 Rajkumari K et al.20 and Nicholson ML.3

The mean distance of mandibular foramen from the posterior border of ramus of mandible was 10.2 mm on the right side and 10.1 mm on left side which was comparable to the studies done by Sandhya K et al.22 and Shalini R et al.19

The mean distance of mandibular foramen from the mandibular incisure was 22.5 mm on right side and 21.9 mm on left side which was similar to the studies done by Sultana Q et al.,17 Padmavathi G et al.16 and Samanta PP et al.10

The mean distance of mandibular foramen from the Mandibular base was 23.7 mm on right side and 24.5 mm on left side, which was comparable to the studies done by Shenoy V et al.,15 Shalini R et al.19 and Nicholson ML.3

The average distance of mandibular foramen from the third molar was 22.9 mm on right side and 23.5 mm on left side which was analogous to the study done by Gopalakrishna K et al.18 but less when compared to the studies done by Shalini R et al.,19 Nicholson ML3 and Sultana Q et al.17

The mean distance of mandibular foramen from the apex of retromolar trigone was 18.2 mm on right side and 19.7 mm on left side which was more when compared with the study done by Shalini R et al.19

The anterior posterior distance of ramus of mandible was found 29.9 mm on right side and 29.7 mm on left side which was matching with the studies done by Ennes JP & Medeiros RM12 and, Nicholson ML.3

The foramen width was observed to be 4.5 mm and 4.4 mm on right and left side respectively which was corresponding to the study done by Shalini R et al.19

Accessory foramen are found bilaterally in 14 mandibles (27.4%) which is more when compared to studies done by Sultana Q et al.,17 Shalini R et al.,19 and Rajkumari K et al..20 Unilaterally it was found in 13.7% and 17.6% on the right and left side respectively, which was lower when compared to study done by Sultana Q et al. 17 and higher when compared to studies done by Shalini R et al.19 and Rajkumari K et al.20

Gonial angles were 122.6° and 124.1° on the right and left sides respectively which corresponds to the study done by Singh S et al.23 It was comparatively higher than study done by Nicholson ML3 and lower when compared to studies done by Shenoy V et al.15 and Ennes JP & Medeiros RM.12

In the present study mandibular foramen was predominantly below the occlusal plane of molar teeth was in accordance to the study done by Nicholson ML.3

Present study mainly concentrated on precise location of mandibular foramen by measuring the mean distances from various bony landmarks on the mandible. It was found that the location was almost similar on both sides of ramus indicating bilateral symmetry. Further, it is clear that the there is a negative correlation between gonial angle and distance between mandibular foramen and anatomical landmarks. Therefore, the gonial angle can be used to infer the distance between various landmarks and mandibular foramen.

The dentist should be well informed about the common occurrence of accessory mandibular foramina as it may interfere with the inferior alveolar nerve block and prevents complete anaesthesia in the field of interest.

Precise localization of mandibular foramen is clinically very important to achieve effective inferior alveolar nerve block prior to dental surgeries in the lower jaw. This is important for planning and conducting dental procedures such as osteotomy, orthognathic reconstruction surgeries of mandible, and dental implant procedures. This knowledge will be useful for effective management, better result and prognosis of dental procedures and for avoiding injury to neurovascular contents passing through mandibular foramen.

Limitations

The small sample size and lack of details about the age and sex of mandibles are the major limitations of the study.

Conclusion

The present study established the bilateral symmetry existing in distances between mandibular foramen and various anatomical landmarks in the mandible. It clearly identified the negative correlation existing between gonial angle and the distances between mandibular foramen and various anatomical landmarks. It also documents the common presence of accessory mandibular foramina. This information will be of paramount importance to the dental surgeons to understand the location of mandibular foramen in relation to various anatomical landmarks and will enable them to obtain better outcomes in inferior alveolar nerve block.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Data Availability Atatement

The data supporting this study are available with the corresponding author and will be provided on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam – 603 103, Tamil Nadu, India for permitting us to carry out the work.

References

1 

S Standring Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical PracticeElsevierNetherlands2016

2 

SF Malamed Handbook of Local Anesthesia6 edElsevierIndia2012

3 

ML Nicholson A study of the position of the mandibular foramen in the adult human mandibleAnat Rec198521211102

4 

I Potocnik F Bajrović Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in endodonticsEndod Dent Traumatol199915624751

5 

F Vinckier What is the cause of failure of local anesthesia?Rev Belge Med Dent19845514150

6 

GA Madan SG Madan AD Madan Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block: exploring the alternativesJ Am Dent Assoc200213378436

7 

RF Neiva R Gapski HL Wang Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skullsJ Periodontol200475810617

8 

D Komar S Lathrop Frequencies of morphological characteristics in two contemporary forensic collections: implications for identificationJ Forensic Sci20065159748

9 

RN Sutton The practical significance of mandibular accessory foraminaAust Dent J197419316773

10 

PP Samanta P Kharb Morphometric analysis of mandibular foramen and incidence of accessory mandibular foramina in adult human mandibles of an Indian population Revista Argentina De Anatomía ClínicaRev Argentina Anat Clíni201352606

11 

N Kilarkaje SR Nayak P Narayan LV Prabhu The location of the mandibular foramen maintains absolute bilateral symmetry in mandibles of different age-groupsHong Kong Dent J20052357

12 

K Sandhya B Singh N Lugun R Prasad Localization of mandibular foramen relative to landmarks in East Indian mandiblesIndian J Dent Res20152665715

13 

RK Sahu S Panigrahi B Rath S Rath Location of the Mandibular Foramen in Dry Mandibles: A Study in Southern OdishaIOSR J Dent Med Sci201716325

14 

K Rajkumari S Nongthombam R Chongtham S Huidrom P Tharani S Sanjenbam A morphometric study of the mandibular foramen in dry adult human mandibles - A study in RIMS, ImphalIOSR J Dent Med Sci201716123945

15 

R Shalini C Ravivarman R Manoranjitham M Veeramuthu Morphometric study on mandibular foramen and incidence of accessory mandibular foramen in mandibles of south Indian population and its clinical implications in inferior alveolar nerve blockAnat Cell Biol20164942418

16 

K Gopalakrishna S Deepalaxmi S Somashekara B Rathna An anatomical study on the position of mandibular foramen in 100 dry mandiblesInt J Anat Res201641196771

17 

FB Prado FC Groppo MC Volpato PH Caria Morphological changes in the position of the mandibular foramen in dentate and edentate Brazilian subjectsClin Anat20102343948

18 

G Padmavathi S Tiwari K Varalakshmi R Roopashree An Anatomical Study of Mandibular and Accessory Mandibular Foramen in Dry Adult Human Mandibles of South Indian OriginIOSR J Dent Med Sci201413838

19 

JP Ennes RMD Medeiros Localization of mandibular foramen and clinical implicationsInt J Morphol2009274130511

20 

V Shenoy S Vijayalakshmi P Saraswathi Osteometric Analysis of Mandibular Foramen in Dry Human MandiblesJ Clin Diagn Res20126455760

21 

K Thangavelu R Kannan NS Kumar E Rethish S Sabitha N Sayeeganesh Significance of localization of mandibular foramen in an inferior alveolar nerve blockJ Nat Sci Biol Med20123215660

22 

Q Sultana M Shariff R Avadhani Study of surgical landmarks of mandibular foramen for inferior alveolar nerve block: An Osteological studyIndian J Clin Anat Physiol2016313740

23 

S Singh P Kumar P Sinha Sushobhana J Passey R Singh Location of mandibular foramen in correlation with the gonial angle In Indian population: A morphometric study for surgical practicesInt J Anat Res201533134550



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 04-01-2024

Accepted : 23-02-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmi.2024.004


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 551

PDF Downloaded: 190